Conduct quarterly citation audits for all locations' NAP consistency.
Save for later 0
Use × to move an item here. You can restore it when you’re ready.
Your checks and saved items stay in this browser. Nothing is submitted.
Why this matters
Regular quarterly audits prevent accumulated NAP inconsistencies across hundreds of directories that degrade local rankings and are hard to diagnose when unresolved.
Hypothetical standard operating procedure
Adapt this example to your site, access, tools, and change process. It is our suggested procedure, informed by the sources below.
- Compile a complete list of directories where each location is listed using citation management software.
- Use platform tools or scripts to compare each location's NAP against the master spreadsheet data.
- Flag and document any inconsistencies including typos, outdated addresses, or phone numbers.
- Correct discrepancies through bulk update tools or manual corrections within 30 days.
- Log each audit and track recurring issues to improve data governance for future quarters.
Watch for
Infrequent audits allow citation drift that can cause ranking degradation and customer confusion at scale.
Definition of done
Audit reports show zero NAP inconsistencies across all key directories for every location during review period.
Sources & attribution
Original checklist wording and example SOP by Best SEO Checklist, using source-grounded AI assistance. Editorial contact: Ted Kubaitis, @tedkubaitis on Teams. Check current source guidance before implementation.